Following widespread backlash over the
failure of both houses of the National Assembly to pass some significant
amendments which form part of the essence of a restructuring agenda, Senate
President Bukola Saraki on Friday gave some insights into why the devolution of
powers bill failed to scale through the constitution review process.
Saraki
spoke while hosting a delegation of the Not Too Young To Run advocacy group in
Ilorin, the Kwara State capital.
In
what many may interpret to be the usual political-speak after a major
anticlimax, Saraki left the window of possibility open that the bill may
resurface in the future, without specifying any clear plan or strategy to that
effect, or estimating a time frame.
He
went further to attribute the failure of the bill to the current climate of
hate and fear from intense agitations for restructuring and separation, as well
as misconceptions regarding the intent of the bill.
He
stated that there was enough blame to go round, from agitators, to advocates,
to politicians, and even the media.
These
comments might come as a real shock to many Nigerians who were repeatedly
assured of the National Assembly’s unalloyed commitment to key recommendations
such as devolution of powers, state creation and boundary adjustment,
indigeneship and citizenship reform, as well as deletion of the Land Use Act
from the constitution, which all failed in both houses.
Saraki’s comments were
conveyed in a statement from his media office, thus:
“As
you know, we have three senators representing each state and one from the FCT
and they all represent their constituencies and whatever they do there, they
must engage with and get feedback from their constituencies. I believe that if
this constitutional amendment had come maybe eight months ago, the devolution
of powers bill would have passed easily.
“But
I think we must be honest with ourselves that presently there is a lot of
mistrust in the country at the moment; the air is very polluted and let us be
very frank, that blame must go all round; whether it be the politicians, or
opinion leaders, socio-cultural group leaders and some others who are running
commentaries and even some of you in the media who sometimes write stories that
amplify hate speeches and points of view that are inaccurate.
“And
I think what happened was that a lot of of our colleagues misread or
misunderstood or were suspicious of what the devolution of powers to states was
all about; whether it was the same thing as restructuring in another way or
attempt to foist confederation on the country or to prepare the ground for
other campaigns now going on in the country. And they made a lot of appeal that
they had not consulted with their constituencies and you can see what is
happening; there was a meeting in Kaduna yesterday where it was clear that
certain parts of the country wanted more time to understand what restructuring
is all about before joining the discussion.
“So
it is clear that not all Senators were on board. My own advise; we have spoken
a lot with the Senators because we cannot bully them or stampede them, because
at the end of the day, this country belongs to all of us. You cannot hassle me
out of the country. Neither can I hassle you out. What we must do is dialogue;
reassure each other and let people understand that this concept is for the
purpose of making a modern Nigeria; that it is not going to in any way
undermine any part of the country.
“Nothing
is foreclosed in this exercise; you don’t foreclose passage of bill. We must
have a good understanding of how parliament works. It is not foreclosed. It has
been defeated as at today but it does not mean that it would be defeated when
it comes tomorrow. The gender bill was defeated in the bid to include it in the
constitution but what was not reported in the media is that the sponsors got a
victory in that they got an undertaking from members that what was defeated
would be included in the Gender Opportunity bill. That was something that would
not have happened before. So the fact that devolution of powers to state lost
that day does not mean that after the recess, if a lot of consultations are
done again it will not scale through.”
Many
Nigerians may read Saraki’s comments as a failure to take responsibility.
Some will argue that Saraki is only seeking soft landing after failing to
deliver on the high expectations of Nigerians especially on the issues most
central and relevant to the wellbeing of this challenged nation at this time of
its existence.
It
might strike many as paradoxical that while they had expected the National
Assembly to brave the odds and intervene in the pervasive divisiveness tearing
the country apart through targeted amendments, the National Assembly, having
shirked that responsibility, is instead blaming the divisiveness for the
failure of the amendment.
Have
the supposed rescuers become bound by the same malady? Many will wonder.
Source: - Ripples | July 30, 2017.
No comments:
Post a Comment